CONTENT
OF VOLUME 3:1 (2000)
Journal of International Wildlife
Law & Policy
·
Alexander
Gillespie, Whaling under a Scientific Auspice: The Ethics of
Scientific Research Whaling Operations
Ethical
questions that pertain to morals and attempt to ascertain suitable
standards of behaviour within international environmental law, and
the whaling debate in particular, are of increasing interest to the
International
Whaling Commission (IWC). Interest in ethical analysis of
standards arises from recognition that solutions to intractable
problems can only be achieved through ethical discourse. This
article seeks to apply ethical principles to the scientific whaling
controversy (under Article VIII of the International
Convention for the Regulation of Whaling that has swirled at the
IWC over the past decade.
International Whaling Commission, Scientific Whaling, Animal
Rights;
Ethics.
Comments
Abstract:
Ultimately,
“environmental change,” defined recently by the International Whaling Commission as climate change; chemical
pollution, physical and biological habitat degradation; effects of fisheries; ozone
depletion and UV-B radiation; Arctic issues; disease and mortality events;
and the impact of noise, may prove to the greatest peril to the
viability of many cetacean species in this century. This article focuses on the
possible impact of one of these factors, climate change, on cetacean
species. Climate change could prove to be a grave threat to the food
supply of cetacean species in the Antarctic and Arctic, and other
manifestations of warming, including eutrophication and increased runoff of
pollutants from coastal areas as a consequence of increased storm activity,
could also threaten species throughout the world. While the
International Whaling Commission has developed a research program to assess
impacts, it is woefully under funded and the Commission lacks political
influence in the primary forum
to address climate change, the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change. The paper suggests ways that the IWC might be
able to ameliorate climate change impacts, and other relevant regimes where
the IWC may seek to protect the interests of cetaceans.
Keywords:
International Whaling Commission; International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling, Climate Change; Krill
Abstract:
In the 1950s,
the majority of scientists in the International Whaling Commission
(IWC) argued that the fin whale was overexploited in the Southern
Hemisphere. However, several other scientists throughout the period
persistently objected to this view. The scientific controversy
attendant to this issue engendered great uncertainty. This
uncertainty contributed towards extending the period of excessive
whaling, and nearly destroyed the IWC. This paper reviews the fin
whale debate in detail, puts the debate in a political perspective,
and argues that the intentional injection of controversy for
non-scientific reasons in decision-making forums, which the author
terms “distortion of uncertainty,” constitutes an act of scientific
misconduct.
Fin whales; International Whaling Commission; Southern Hemisphere;
Norway.
Documents
[European]
Commission adopts Communication on Precautionary Principle
Essential
Ingredients in an Ecosystem Approach to the Conservation of Tropical
Wildland Biodiversity, Address to SBSTTA [Subsidiary
Body for Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice] for COP 5,
Montreal, 1 Feb 2000 by Daniel H. Janzen, Department of Biology,
University of
Pennsylvania.